Off-Site Cycad Preservation III.
A Final Look at Off-Site Collections
Terrence
Walters, Executive Director
Montgomery Botanical Center
11901 Old Cutler Road
Miami, Florida 33156-4242
U.S.A.
[This is the third
and final article in a series on cycad preservation. The first article defined
off-site, or ex-situ, cycad preservation and suggested that botanical gardens,
arboreta, and other botanical institutions should begin undertaking this type of
preservation (see March 1999 issue of the Newsletter). The second article
discussed how to develop the core off-site collection and how to maintain the
collection long-term (June 1999 issue).]
Do off-site preservation collections really work? only time will tell. Development of off-site cycad collections only began in the 1980s. Today, only a handful of institutions and individuals are committed to maintaining and propagating documented colonies obtained from native populations. Two institutions have already made long-term commitments to an off-site cycad preservation program. The National Botanical Institute in South Africa and Montgomery Botanical Center in Miami are now developing off-site collections that provide material for research, educational programs, and display collections. In addition, these collections are relieving the pressure on native populations by producing seeds for the horticultural community and other botanical gardens, providing protective custody for taxa, and, if necessary, plants suitable for reintroduction in case specific taxa become extinct in the wild.
We
Cannot Do It All!
At least 350 taxa of
cycads are known today. Once fieldwork and taxonomic research are completed in
unexplored areas such as Asia, Central America, and South America, we will
probably exceed 500 cycad taxa. Sadly, the threatened status for the majority of
cycad taxa is unknown.
The Table lists 64
cycads that are considered threatened taxa by Osborne (1995a). The World
Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) database, as of March 20, 1993, considers
107 cycad taxa threatened, extinct, or endangered. Let us assume that each of
the 107 threatened taxa, taking an extremely conservative and rather unlikely
scenario, consists of only one known population. To preserve the 107 taxa, and
assuming that we need to manage approximately 15 plants per population, this
would mean off-site collections containing a minimum total of 1,605
plants. If these taxa consist of more than one population, this minimum
would increase based on the number of population samples required.
With the above in
mind, there are a number of objectives that urgently need to be focused on with
respect to a realistic program for development of world-wide, off-site
preservation collections of cycads.
·
Set priorities for which taxa
need to be preserved in off-site collections.
This
objective can begin by evaluating Osbornes (1995a) and the WCMCs (1993)
lists on the threatened species status of cycads. Osborne (1995a) based his 1991
and 1992 study on the 200 described species of cycads known at that time. The
study listed 15 taxa as critical, with a count of less than 250 mature plants in
the wild. Obviously, these 15 taxa would be considered high priority for
off-site preservation.
It
is vital that the reader understand that data concerning the threatened status
for many cycad taxa were not available for the above studies. In addition, since
the completion of these studies, many new taxa have been described, especially
within the genus Cycas, and data
concerning the threatened status of taxa are still not available on cycads from
Central and South American and south and southeastern Asia.
It
is clear that the list of cycads in the Table is based on regions of the world
where intensive research on wild populations has occurred. Note the lack of any
endangered species from South America, Cambodia, and Thailand. Also note that
the greatest number of endangered
species occurs in the Republic of South Africa, the country that has had, and
continues to have, the most active cycad field research. A number of taxa are
listed as endangered in Mexico, another country that has a strong history of
cycad field research activities. Therefore, one should consider that this list
is far from complete; it is biased for countries with active cycad field
research programs.
Before setting priorities on what taxa need
preservation, Osbornes (1995a) and the WCMCs (1993) listings must be
updated based on recent field investigations and taxonomic studies.
·
Identify existing off-site
preservation collections.
The next logical step following the
above objective would be to evaluate the taxa on the lists with respect to
whether off-site collections already exist and, if not, what institutions might
support an off-site collection for each taxon.
A census similar to Osbornes 1995a
census should be sent to all individuals, gardens, and institutions that might
have off-site cycad collections to determine where existing off-site collections
occur, what taxa are part of the collections, and the quality of documentation
for each of the plants within the collections.
·
Countries with native cycads
must evaluate the health of their cycad populations.
In countries where native cycad
populations occur, botanical gardens, field stations, arboreta, and other
related institutions within the country must evaluate the status of their cycad
populations, decide which institution should develop off-site collections for
which populations or taxa, and immediately begin the development of the core
collection, either on their own site or in collaboration with a foreign
institution.
·
Appropriate institutions and
private collectors need to offer and commit to providing long-term space and
financial support for off-site cycad collections representing a population,
taxon, or taxa.
The
IUCN Cycad Specialist Group should canvas tropical and subtropical botanical
gardens, arboreta, agricultural experiment stations, and educational
institutions to seek financial and space support for developing and managing at
least one off-site collection of a taxon for those taxa that require immediate
preservation.
Osborne
(1995b) listed 25 of the worlds top cycad collections. Obviously, these
institutions and private collectors already have a long-term commitment and
devotion to cycads. If each of them committed to obtaining and managing one
off-site collection for a taxon, this would at least be preserving the majority
of taxa known to be critically endangered.
Botanical
institutions within a country with native cycads that are not able to provide
space, time, monies, or trained personnel for developing and maintaining an
off-site collection for their native species must initiate a collaborative
relationship with a foreign institution to support the preservation of their
cycads. The native institution would provide the foreign institution
wild-collected, thoroughly documented seeds for the development of the
collection. Both institutions would develop a Memorandum of Understanding,
whereby the collection remains the property of the native institution, and the
foreign institution ensures that the collection is maintained, propagated, and
available for educational purposes. Research on the off-site collection must be
encouraged by both institutions. The more accessible the collections are for
scientific study, the greater the opportunity to obtain vital data for future
resource management practices for the taxon in its native habitat. Any
commercial research would require approval from the native institution. All
resulting activities, including seed production and research activities, would
be reported to the native institution by the foreign institution.
·
Local and national
governments, as well as CITES offices, must support and encourage, instead of
restricting, the development of these off-site collections and the future
distribution of seeds resulting from these collections.
Regulations, permit requirements,
and logistics of obtaining material for off-site collections place very strong
obstacles in the path to their development. A more positive approach,
encouraging the timely and efficient development and long-term management of
these collections, must be supported and put in place by government regulators
and permitting offices. In addition, international distribution of seed
generated by off-site collections must be encouraged and supported by all the
regulatory offices of all CITES countries.
Authors
Note: I would like to thank William Tang and Tom Broome for their comments and
suggestions on an original draft of this article. The opinions expressed in this
article are strictly the authors.
Literature
Cited
Osborne,
R. 1995a. The 19911992 world cycad census and a proposed revision of the
threatened species status for cycads. In: Proceedings
of the Third International Conference on Cycad Biology, ed. P. Vorster. The
Cycad Society of South Africa, Matieland, South Africa.
Osborne,
R. 1995b. The world cycad census and a proposed revision of the threatened
species status for cycad taxa. Biological
Conservation 71:1-12.
Cycad
taxa that are considered endangered, critically endangered, or extinct in the
wild according to Osborne (1995a). The author has removed some taxa from the
original list based on recent field investigations and updated the taxonomy of
other taxa in the original list. Taxa are arranged alphabetically by taxon.
SPECIES |
STATUS[1] |
NATIVE
COUNTRY |
CERATOZAMIA |
|
|
Ceratozamia
eurphyllidia |
CR |
Mexico |
Ceratozamia
hildae |
EN |
Mexico |
Ceratozamia
kuesteriana |
EN |
Mexico |
Ceratozamia
miqueliana |
EN |
Mexico |
Ceratozamia
norstogii |
EN |
Mexico |
Ceratozamia
zaragoze |
CR |
Mexico |
|
|
|
CHIGUA |
|
|
Chigua
bernalii |
CR |
Colombia |
Chigua
restrepoi |
CR |
Colombia |
|
|
|
CYCAS |
|
|
Cycas
beddomei |
EN |
India |
Cycas
brunnea |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
cairnsiana |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
chamberlainii |
EN |
Philippines |
Cycas
conferta |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
couttisana |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
curranii |
EN |
Phillipines |
Cycas
multipinnata |
EW[2] |
China |
Cycas
ophiolitica |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
orientis |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
silvestris |
EN |
Australia |
Cycas
szechuanensis |
EW |
China |
Cycas
taiwaniana |
EW |
China |
Cycas
wadei |
CR |
Philippines |
|
|
|
DIOON |
|
|
Dioon
califanoi |
EN |
Mexico |
Dioon
caputoi |
CR |
Mexico |
Dioon
holmgrenii |
EN |
Mexico |
Dioon
purpusii |
EN |
Mexico |
Dioon
rzedowskii |
EN |
Mexico |
D.
tomaselii var. sonorense |
EN |
Mexico |
|
|
|
ENCEPHALARTOS
|
|
|
Encephalartos
aemulans |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
arenarius |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
cerinus |
CR |
Republic of
South Africa |
E.
chimanimaniensis |
CR |
Mozambique &
Zimbabwe |
Encephalartos
concinnus |
EN |
Zimbabwe |
Encephalartos
cupidus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
dolomiticus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
dyerianus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
heenanii |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa & Swaziland |
Encephalartos
inopinus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
laevifolius |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa & Swaziland |
Encephalartos
latifrons |
CR |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
lebomboensis |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
E.
marunguensis |
EN |
Zaire |
E.
middleburgensis |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
msinganus |
CR |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
munchii |
CR |
Mozambique |
E.
nubimontanus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa |
Encephalartos
paucidentatus |
EN |
Republic of
South Africa & Swaziland |
Encephalartos
pterogonus |
CR |
Mozambique |
Encephalartos
schmitzii |
CR |
Zaire &
Zambia |
Encephalartos
turneri |
EN |
Mozambique |
Encephalartos
woodii |
EW |
Republic of
South Africa |
|
|
|
MACROZAMIA |
|
|
Macrozamia
fearnsidei |
EN |
Australia |
Macrozamia
flexuosa |
EN |
Australia |
|
|
|
MICROCYCAS |
|
|
Microcycas
calocoma |
EN |
Cuba |
|
|
|
ZAMIA |
|
|
Zamia
angustifolia |
EN |
Bahamas &
Cuba |
Zamia
chigua |
EN |
Colombia &
Panama |
Zamia
herrerae |
EN |
Mexico |
Zamia
inermis |
EN |
Mexico |
Zamia
purpurea |
EN |
Mexico |
Zamia
skinneri |
EN |
Nicaragua,
Panama, & Costa Rica |
Zamia
soconuscensis |
EN |
Mexico |
Zamia
variegata |
EN |
Mexico &
Guatemala |
Zamia
vazquezii |
CR |
Mexico |
Zamia
wallisii |
CR |
Colombia |
|
|
|
[1] Drawn
from Osborne (1995a): EN = endangered, EW = extinct in the wild, CR =
critical. Some taxa have been deleted from the 1995 listing based on recent
field reports from Asia.
[2]
This species was recently located in the wild and probably should be
considered at the endangered level.
Note: This article first appeared in the The Cycad Newsletter and is reprinted here with permission from the author.
PACSOF Home Page | |||
Virtual
Cycad Encyclopedia Site Map Powered by FreeFind. |
This site is copyrighted © 1998, 1999, 2000, Palm & Cycad Societies of
Florida (PACSOF)
For questions or comments, e-mail the webmaster.
Internet hosting provided by Zone 10,
Inc.